From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 22 19:00:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE57916A426 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 19:00:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B2943D5A for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 19:00:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j8MJ0ZRr042023 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 19:00:35 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j8MJ0ZLm042022; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 19:00:35 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 19:00:35 GMT Message-Id: <200509221900.j8MJ0ZLm042022@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Igor Pokrovsky Cc: Subject: Re: ports/86440: [UPDATE] games/deng: integrate with "doom-data", fix segmentation fault X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Igor Pokrovsky List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 19:00:35 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/86440; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Igor Pokrovsky To: Simon Barner Cc: FreeBSD gnats submit Subject: Re: ports/86440: [UPDATE] games/deng: integrate with "doom-data", fix segmentation fault Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 22:53:26 +0400 On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 03:22:50PM +0200, Simon Barner wrote: > Dear maintainer, > > Alejandro Pulver submitted a various PRs in an > effort to the clean up DooM based ports on in the FreeBSD ports > collection. > > He suggests adding a new port for the datafiles (ports/86439), and > modifying all doom ports to make use of it. > > Please have a look at the changes, and say, if you approve them: Hi Simon, It's really a very good idea to have only one dir with doom data for all doom ports. But at the moment I can only agree with the part of his patch - a part which fixes segmentation fault of deng on exit. I don't feel the rest of submitted changes are really required at the moment. I think I'll make some changes myself once/if port doom-data will be committed. Regards, -ip -- Whenever you cut your fingernails you will find a need for them an hour later.