From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 23 06:37:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429FB106566B; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:37:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kaduk@MIT.EDU) Received: from biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (BISCAYNE-ONE-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D818FC15; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:37:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.9.2) with ESMTP id nAN6Pvk5017092; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:25:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from multics.mit.edu (MULTICS.MIT.EDU [18.187.1.73]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id nAN6QOdU028963 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:26:24 -0500 (EST) Received: (from kaduk@localhost) by multics.mit.edu (8.12.9.20060308) id nAN6QHew002376; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:26:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:26:17 -0500 (EST) From: Benjamin Kaduk To: miwi@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200911221235.nAMCZnnk068919@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <200911221235.nAMCZnnk068919@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (GSO 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.00 Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/140767: [new port] sysutils/libss X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:37:26 -0000 On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, miwi@freebsd.org wrote: > Synopsis: [new port] sysutils/libss > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: miwi > State-Changed-When: Sun Nov 22 12:35:48 UTC 2009 > State-Changed-Why: > would it not better to create a salve port direct from > sysutils/e2fsprogs ? It probably would. I guess I got distracted by reading the porter's handbook and didn't think about such things. I'll take a look and see how feasible it is (my first attempt has failed, but I haven't run into any walls, yet). -Ben Kaduk