From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Sep 4 11:12:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F3037B405 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:12:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f84IC5T79375; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 20:12:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Cc: tlambert2@mindspring.com, Zhihui Zhang , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What is VT_TFS? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 04 Sep 2001 12:06:42 MDT." <15253.6194.432852.114923@nomad.yogotech.com> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 20:12:05 +0200 Message-ID: <79373.999627125@critter> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <15253.6194.432852.114923@nomad.yogotech.com>, Nate Williams writes: >> TRW supported a lot of the early >> 386BSD/FreeBSD effort, back before Walnut Creek CDROM threw >> in and had us change the version number from 0.1 to 1.0 to >> make it a bit easier to sell. > >*Huh* That's revisionist history if I've ever heard it. We did a 1.0 >release for FreeBSD because we wanted to differentiate ourselves from >386BSD (lot of bad blood there with the Jolitz's) and NetBSD (which had >a 0.8 release at that time). Nate, You're replying to Terry for christs sake! What did you expect if not revisionist $anything ? Which reminds me, Adrian still oves us his story about ref :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message