From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Aug  9 10:31: 1 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mail2.wmptl.com (mail2.wmptl.com [216.221.73.131])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9AC37B850
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed,  9 Aug 2000 10:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from webmaster@wmptl.com)
Received: from wmptl.com ([10.0.0.168])
	by mail2.wmptl.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA76515;
	Wed, 9 Aug 2000 13:29:17 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from webmaster@wmptl.com)
Message-ID: <399194DB.47DCA8CD@wmptl.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2000 13:28:59 -0400
From: Nathan Vidican <webmaster@wmptl.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org>
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SMBFS
References: <200008091608.MAA45997@blackhelicopters.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Michael Lucas wrote:
> 
> My understanding of SMBFS is that it's not intended to be a server.
> 
> It's a pretty solid client, though.  I use it extensively, without trouble.
> 
> ==ml
> 
> > What's the current status the native smbfs support? Can it act as a both a
> > client and a server? How does it compare to Samba in terms of functionality?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Brandon
> >
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> >
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

How did you implement SMBFS? Is it yet a part of FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE or?
New kernel option?


-- 
Nathan Vidican
webmaster@wmptl.com
Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd.
http://www.wmptl.com/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message