From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 31 19:31:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA941065674; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:31:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B5428FC12; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id WAA10786; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:31:47 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1Qnbjn-000BJY-Gk; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:31:47 +0300 Message-ID: <4E35ADA3.40401@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:31:47 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4E345DBD.1090503@FreeBSD.org> <4E34B0BB.9050008@FreeBSD.org> <4E353A46.1050204@FreeBSD.org> <4E35A998.5060102@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E35A998.5060102@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: UPDATING 20110730 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:31:50 -0000 on 31/07/2011 22:14 Doug Barton said the following: > On 07/31/2011 04:19, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 31/07/2011 04:32 Doug Barton said the following: > >>> I am not sure what you mean by "inside portmaster" is quite accurate. I >>> followed the instructions and everything worked according to plan. The >>> vast majority of the wall clock time spent following these instructions >>> is in the compilation of the various ports. >> >> Well, then we have different experiences and maybe environments. >> I am quite sure that more than 1 hour of wall time was spent in portmaster >> proper after portmaster performed upgrade of gio-fam-backend-2.28.8 and before >> portmaster had a a chance to proceed to the next port > > That's very odd. It was moments for me between each port on my middle of > the road laptop. > >> Some stats about my ports: >> $ l /var/db/pkg/ | wc -l >> 1088 >> $ pkg_info -R gio-fam-backend-2.28.8| wc -l >> 27 >> $ pkg_info -R gtk-2.24.5 | wc -l >> 132 >> $ pkg_info -R gobject-introspection-0.10.8| wc -l >> 219 > > You have about twice as many ports installed as I do, and that's a lot > depending on gobject-introspection. But still an hour is very disturbing. > >> I am not complaining about the messages. >> My complaint is about the performance of handling this case. > > Understood, but I'm not sure what I can do about it unless I can > reproduce it. I understand. Another thing to keep in mind is that the performance might not scale linearly with a number of relevant ports. If for X ports all the relevant data under /var/db/pkg fits into fs cache, then the performance may be blazing, but once you exceed the cache size the performance might become totally different. -- Andriy Gapon