From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 13 03:48:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D8B16A403; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 03:48:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pittgoth.com (ns1.pittgoth.com [216.38.206.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76F043D46; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 03:48:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (net-ix.gw.ai.net [205.134.160.6] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9D3mCP2085981 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 Oct 2006 23:48:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 23:48:00 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: Mikhail Teterin Message-Id: <20061012234800.3131bd97.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200610122226.39844.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> References: <200610120845.k9C8jDdc070356@freefall.freebsd.org> <200610122226.39844.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: trhodes@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org, mi@aldan.algebra.com, jmacd@cs.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: docs/65530: [patch] minor improvement to getgrent(3) X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 03:48:44 -0000 On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:26:39 -0400 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > =DE=C5=D4=D7=C5=D2 12 =D6=CF=D7=D4=C5=CE=D8 2006 04:45, Tom Rhodes =CE=C1= =D0=C9=D3=C1=D7: > > This information is duplicated from the /usr/include/grp.h > > header file, we should change both or none. >=20 > Why? Header files are only a second-from-last sources of information=20 > (implementation being the last). A good manual page leaves no need to loo= k at=20 > the declaration. Then we should patch both, not just one. >=20 > > I don't see a good reason to really change them right now as it seems s= eems > > self-explainatory. =9AThanks for the submission! >=20 > ?? The information was put there in 1996 -- it just got lost because of a= cvs=20 > mishap. >=20 > I don't believe it to be self-explanatory -- there is not even a single=20 > example in the man-page. One could *guess*, that the list is null termina= ted,=20 > but it should be explicit, or else time will be wasted searching for othe= r=20 > api (getgroupnumber() ?) or writing test-programs. To me it seems fine, but if you want both patched then go for it. Send me a patch please. ;) --=20 Tom Rhodes