From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Dec 15 18:09:03 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA10296 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 18:09:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA10284 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 18:08:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA03623; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 18:08:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199712160208.SAA03623@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: freebsd@tomqnx.com (Tom Torrance) cc: marcs@znep.com (Marc Slemko), bmcgover@cisco.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Weird IP addresses In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 15 Dec 1997 15:53:36 EST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 18:08:21 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Last week I mailed to abuse@netcom.com and at least this guy is not going to be bothering us anymore from netcom.com. I think we need a global Spammer Net Rating because I am sure the spammer is just going to move to a different ISP . Amancio abuse@netcom.com said: > Hello. > We have terminated the account of our user for breaking our policies. > In the future we will not allow this person to purchase another > account through us, at NETCOM. If you receive any further contact > from this user through NETCOM, please contact us immediatly. For more > information on these Acceptable Useage and Guidelines, please review > them at this website. > http://www.netcom.com/netcom/aug.html > We apoligize for any inconveniance our user may have caused. > Keman NETCOM Policy Management ---------------------------------------- > ------------------------------ NETCOM On-Line Communication Services, > Inc. abuse@netcom.com NETCOM Policy Management: (408) > 881-3499 M-F 9AM-5PM PST 24-Hour Technical Support: (408) > 881-1810 support@netcom.com ----------------------------------- > ----------------------------------- > You wrote: > From hasty@netcom.com Sun Dec 14 04:15:14 1997 > Received: from netcom14.netcom.com (hasty@netcom14.netcom.com > [192.100.81.126]) by office4.corp.netcom.com (8.6.12/Netcom-Corp) with > ESMTP id EAA14631 for ; Sun, 14 Dec 1997 > 04:15:13 -0800 > Received: (from hasty@localhost) > by netcom14.netcom.com (8.8.5-r-beta/8.8.5/(NETCOM v1.02)) id > EAA16254 > for abuse@netcom.com; Sun, 14 Dec 1997 04:15:13 -0800 (PST) > Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 04:15:13 -0800 (PST) > From: Amancio Hasty Jr > Message-Id: <199712141215.EAA16254@netcom14.netcom.com> > To: abuse@netcom.com > Subject: Howdy you seem to have a very persisten spammmer > Status: RO > > > I have received dozens of e-mail messages from: > > Return-path: 78204332@moneymakers.com > Received: from dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com > [206.214.98.2]) > by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA03604 > for ; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 17:30:36 > -0800 (PST) > (envelope-from 78204332@moneymakers.com) > Received: (from smap@localhost) > by dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) > id TAA05843; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 19:28:34 -0600 (CST) > Received: from nbw-nj14-15.ix.netcom.com(198.211.225.207) by > dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) > id rma004573; Fri Dec 12 19:20:53 1997 > Received: from mailhost.moneymakers.com ( SYTM.moneymakers.com > (203.74.9.110)) by moneymakers.com (8.8.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id GAA05881 > for ; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 20:03:10 -0600 > (EST) > Message-id: <199746522791.FBB03720@moneymakers.com> > Reply-to: ShowYouTheMoney@moneymakers.com > X-pmflags: 128 0 > X-uidl: 64827751009732159745119985624733 > Comments: Authenticated sender is > From: 78204332@moneymakers.com > Date: Fri, 12 Dec 97 20:03:10 EST > To: ShowYouTheMoney@moneymakers.com > Subject: Make $2,000 - $5,000 per week -NOT MLM > > 

> ARE YOU READY TO MAKE IT; WILL THE LIGHT GO ON?
> 
> 	Tnks,
> 	Amancio
>