From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 29 12:00:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847971065670; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 12:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1E38FC13; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 12:00:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so9787893wwf.31 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 04:00:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jm3QescwB+7eD3BE80ukdOvmFIWdcZ0+BUiU3Fw9J7U=; b=eDV8vbRHFr3A6NuAxqBYVYumiBklchACUBOiTCb/pqLlmhLj9ZUBQWQY3NMHnMZI5n 6s05kGdAWD3naGJKw9s0ToWSPY54Bvvg50Z0u+Hhb5HMMsIUwwwD9eGc9r5CfJmMEknZ XjIXZoLwPWwHPoA7g4KFwPBnSJNh+9stVbybY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=OytnKppWXox1GyUWDJM9q/mUKTIzC7ZbDcrcRhO+qwn3kVHC9Fxo5bZOlWNXFLdY8M C19IYqJNFOvFy9oQ5qIYztY64WGTnpsETC8S7k5y/SP3+jh90t9UtZ7N9meSBMm+W9JJ RC08guJ9p0nIxSfSlBgM1Vzqm379YTuTP15lw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.141.75 with SMTP id f53mr2568584wej.16.1293624027100; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 04:00:27 -0800 (PST) Sender: yanegomi@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.254.226 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Dec 2010 04:00:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D1A1EDC.8010603@bsdimp.com> References: <201012272352.oBRNqeEb040247@svn.freebsd.org> <20101228015905.GA81514@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4D194551.7000004@freebsd.org> <20101228020900.GA81611@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4D1A1EDC.8010603@bsdimp.com> Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 04:00:26 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LzpelG9t9IdnuZJmxODoL4-Dfss Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Colin Percival , Steve Kargl Subject: Re: svn commit: r216746 - head/sys/conf X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 12:00:29 -0000 On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > On 12/27/2010 19:09, Steve Kargl wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 06:02:57PM -0800, Colin Percival wrote: >>> >>> On 12/27/10 17:59, Steve Kargl wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:52:40PM +0000, Colin Percival wrote: >>>>> >>>>> =A0 Make it possible to specify WITHOUT_MODULES in a kernel config fi= le. >>>> >>>> Can you explain how this differs from >>>> makeoptions =A0 =A0 NO_MODULES >>>> which has been able to do for years? >>> >>> NO_MODULES means what it says: No modules. >>> >>> WITHOUT_MODULES=3D"foo bar baz" means "go ahead and build modules excep= t >>> for foo, >>> bar, and baz". >>> >> Thanks. =A0The distincion wasn't clear from the commit log. >> I read it as "Build a kernel WITHOUT building MODULES", >> which is what NO_MODULES does. > > which is why I'd like to have its name changed: it is confusing this way.= .. Wouldn't it be better to have MODULES_EXCLUDE and MODULES_INCLUDE or something along those lines? MODULES_OVERRIDE doesn't really have a nice clean antonym to go with it according to my friendly neighborhood thesaurus. Thanks, -Garrett