From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 14:21:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96C8106566C for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:21:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DD08FC08 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:21:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1QyPC1-0004IG-BW>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:21:33 +0200 Received: from e178029245.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.29.245] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1QyPC1-0005RH-8c>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:21:33 +0200 Message-ID: <4E5CF1ED.2030504@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:21:33 +0200 From: "Hartmann, O." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110825 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mihamina Rakotomandimby References: <4E5941D6.9090106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E5BEF65.2010502@gmail.com> <4E5CAD9E.6050903@rktmb.org> <4E5CB49F.50806@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E5CBC14.4080908@rktmb.org> In-Reply-To: <4E5CBC14.4080908@rktmb.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.29.245 Cc: freebsd Current Subject: Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:21:34 -0000 On 08/30/11 12:31, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: > On 08/30/2011 12:59 PM, Hartmann, O. wrote: >> I would be happy if such a page would see an update in shorter terms >> like 11 years ... > > I agree with you. > > But I also express my opinion that updating such a document should be > done by a third party. > I slightly disagree with that. Who else than the developer/core team members know better about what's in and what's not in the FreeBSD box? And by the way, if our community would be that proud and big as it was eleven years ago, I'm pretty sure there would already be a Wiki driven by a third party! So it is a wise advisory to sit there and wait for a third party, whatever this party may look alike? Just my opinion about that. Oliver