From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 14:32:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4DC51065678 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:32:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E49E8FC25 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Jun 2011 14:32:50 -0000 Received: from dtmd-4db20450.pool.mediaWays.net (EHLO [192.168.178.23]) [77.178.4.80] by mail.gmx.net (mp038) with SMTP; 01 Jun 2011 16:32:50 +0200 X-Authenticated: #428038 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18afNF5GTgavOXiJTVsB+6eavLOOJdrrj0XK9KnE0 BTuBintzgUkOIu Message-ID: <4DE64D92.6050709@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:32:50 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <4DE5D8C9.3020506@icyb.net.ua> <4DE6244E.1040301@FreeBSD.org> <20110601114442.GB2223@reindeer.exwg.net> <4DE6392D.5000106@gmx.de> <20110601131956.GC2223@reindeer.exwg.net> <4DE64546.7070604@FreeBSD.org> <4DE64BC7.5040804@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: amatus@gnu.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lang/guile build fails for me X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:32:52 -0000 Am 01.06.2011 16:30, schrieb Baptiste Daroussin: > If someone comes with a better solution for USE_NCURSES please be > aware that the solution will also fits with USE_OPENSSL > so that the job won't be done twice. > > Anyway I think the fix is not to add anyflags to configure_env > manually (would it be from USE_* of in the ports itself) > > Maybe LDFLAGS should always be appended to CONFIGURE_ENV has it has > been done for CPPFLAGS. The latter was my idea, too. On the "don't add to CONFIGURE_ENV" however, this facility has been provided for exactly this purpose for quite a while now, changing policies is a major (possibly disruptive) change. -- Matthias Andree