From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 5 12:25:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606FA37B401 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 12:25:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from colossus.systems.pipex.net (colossus.systems.pipex.net [62.241.160.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB6043F75 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 12:25:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stacey@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from [192.168.1.8] (81-86-129-77.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.129.77]) by colossus.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F6D16000298; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 21:25:48 +0100 (BST) From: Stacey Roberts To: Matthew Seaman , FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: <20030405195450.GB4092@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> References: <20030404170457.GM19496@crom.vickiandstacey.com> <20030404174607.GA95866@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> <1049558728.10668.15.camel@localhost> <20030405193254.GA4092@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> <1049571556.95089.25.camel@localhost> <20030405195450.GB4092@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1049574347.771.11.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 05 Apr 2003 21:25:47 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: "make index" after latest cvsup of ports tree seg faults X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: stacey@vickiandstacey.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 20:25:50 -0000 On Sat, 2003-04-05 at 20:54, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 08:39:17PM +0100, Stacey Roberts wrote: > > > On Sat, 2003-04-05 at 20:32, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > > About the only thing I can think of is if you've got a few more chunks > > > of ports than is really healthy listed in your cvsup refuse file. > > > > I've not actually *touched* the refuse file at all. Here's what that > > file looks like on this system: > > /usr/share/examples/cvsup $ ls -la refuse > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 307 Mar 22 12:25 refuse > > Uh --- that's just an example file. The active file would be > /usr/sup/refuse, which is empty by default. Or it might be > non-existent. Either way same difference: it shouldn't cause the sort > of problem you're seeing. Yes, that's what I was just thinking myself:-) > > > As I mentioned, nothing customised here at all. I always make sure to > > run as close to defaults here as I can.., makes for easier gathering of > > information without having to analyze through amendments & > > customizations. > > Very sound thinking. But that leaves me even more perplexed as to why > you're having problems. About the only thing I can suggest is just to > re-cvsup and try again. I'll do that. Here's what I'll be doing for good measure: 1] rm -rf /usr/ports/* 2] Re-cvsup 3] Portupgrade any ports that might need updating 4] Run "make index" Thanks for taking the time, I'll let you know how it goes. Regards, Stacey > > Cheers, > > Matthew -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com