From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 12 12:14:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C5F1065674; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:14:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894148FC0C; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id OAA28444; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:14:47 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4CDD2FB7.3000401@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:14:47 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislav Sedov References: <20101110204152.GF85693@acme.spoerlein.net> <20101111145544.GH85693@acme.spoerlein.net> <20101111150801.33afa33b.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20101111150801.33afa33b.stas@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: uqs@spoerlein.net, hackers@freebsd.org, Robert Watson Subject: Re: libkvm: consumers of kvm_getprocs for non-live kernels? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:14:50 -0000 on 12/11/2010 01:08 Stanislav Sedov said the following: > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:55:45 +0100 > Ulrich Spörlein mentioned: >> >>> Stas has ongoing work on a libprocstat, you might want to give him a ping. >>> I'm not sure if he plans to refactor some of those existing tools to use that >>> library or not, but crashdump support is a key goal of it. >> >> Thanks for the hint, stas CC'ed and reply-to set. >> > > Yes, the idea was to refactor all base tools > to use libprocstat as well. So far only > procstat(8), fuser and fstat have been converted to use new functionality, so they are able to operate both on coredumps and on the live system. > We still need to commit the libprocstat itself, > though. > Just to let you know that I am eagerly awaiting for that to happen. Perhaps even could help with something if you'd need that. -- Andriy Gapon