From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 23 17:56:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2AF16A422 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:56:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnu.raiz@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B16243D7E for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:56:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnu.raiz@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so474874wxc for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:56:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=DoF0cYlypES1pQ0IkAaNKlt4EEIA/iCKZjXRcUY1nIoF90rDA+eXUdrUxldSiyKoaP01pzTFXxB8ABTByV4kEaVnWC63nIZUWESjyZXGmU5y1JJ+BR29f0DgKPaGiZ+riskYBWFuLSX3qBhue0RjZnz8X3Hv3o12jrFtB4gKNJg= Received: by 10.70.89.3 with SMTP id m3mr3522892wxb; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:56:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.69.9 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:56:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:56:11 -0600 From: Gnu_Raiz To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <43AC2E52.8000304@root.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20051222020349.GA16607@poupinou.org> <43AC2E52.8000304@root.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Z00Q Problem Tyan MB! X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:56:21 -0000 On 12/23/05, Nate Lawson wrote: > > > > You can work around this problem with info from PR kern/89879 > > http://people.freebsd.org/~ariff/acer_ferrari/ > > A future acpica import may address this problem. The aml is accessing a > field before it's defined. The newest acpica adds support for lazy > evaluation (even though this is out of spec). > > -- > Nate I did see that in my research, since it was a laptop, and a different chipset I thought it would not be aplicable to my Tyan board. I might play around with his .asl file, but I am still at a loss as what do with it. Just running a diff on the two version creates a 284K file. I really am at = a loss, I have no idea where to start. Gnu_Raiz rcall