From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 22 14:02:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@www.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@www.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C5B16A422 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:02:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dodell@offmyserver.com) Received: from raqdevil.offmyserver.com (ext-unused-110.ixsystems.net [206.40.55.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 102DB43D46 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:02:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dodell@offmyserver.com) Received: from raqdevil.offmyserver.com (dho@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by raqdevil.offmyserver.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7ME1oUW035593; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:01:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dodell@offmyserver.com) Received: (from dho@localhost) by raqdevil.offmyserver.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j7ME1o6u035592; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:01:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dodell@offmyserver.com) X-Authentication-Warning: raqdevil.offmyserver.com: dho set sender to dodell@offmyserver.com using -f Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:01:50 -0700 From: "Devon H. O'Dell" To: Andrew Gallatin Message-ID: <20050822140150.GB27233@raqdevil.offmyserver.com> References: <17161.51084.456346.976929@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <1124715244.75167.40.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <17161.53691.614602.758290@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <4309D293.8030104@centtech.com> <17161.55733.272571.61428@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17161.55733.272571.61428@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-current@www.freebsd.org, Eric Anderson Subject: Re: Beta2: Nice job! X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:02:54 -0000 On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 09:57:09AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > Eric Anderson writes: > > > > Just to check the obvious, but, you are certain you are running at the > > native resolution of the LCD panel, correct? > > Yep, its running at the native resolution. > > Drew For what it's worth, I've always found the anti-aliasing of fonts in GTK applications to be sub-par. They all use Bitstream Vera at a ridiculously small font size and seem to blur into the background by like two pixels on each side. I don't mind Bitstream Vera at all, but I agree, I cannot stand the way antialiased fonts look in these applications. --Devon