From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Apr 5 20:10:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [216.187.105.150]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2AB37B427; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 20:09:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from wocker (wocker.unixathome.org [192.168.0.99]) by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C633F28; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 23:10:10 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Langille" Organization: DVL Software Limited To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 23:09:49 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: latest INDEX count versus cvs Reply-To: dan@langille.org Cc: statue@freebsd.sinica.edu.tw, esk@ira.uka.de, sada@freebsd.org, ijliao@FreeBSD.org, mi@aldan.algebra.com X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.01) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Message-Id: <20020406041010.D0C633F28@bast.unixathome.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi folks, [this msg has been cc'd to the maintainers of the ports in question] A new INDEX was just committed with 6777 ports. I've just finished a reconciliation between cvs, INDEX, and FreshPorts. Here are my findings: The following ports are being pulled out of a cvsup, but are not appearing in INDEX. Does anyone have a reason why they should not be added to their respective catetgory Makefiles? chinese/cwtex devel/arm-elf-gcc31 japanese/alias-fonts math/libgmp4 math/libgmp-freebsd textproc/tclxml My count of ports based on a cvsup: 6783 INDEX shows 6777 The difference is the above 6 ports. cheers -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message