From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Nov 10 16:34:01 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA13307
          for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:34:01 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA13156;
          Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:32:41 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from mph@FreeBSD.org)
From: Matthew Hunt <mph@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from mph@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) id QAA27438;
	Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:32:44 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:32:44 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199811110032.QAA27438@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: eischen@vigrid.com, mph@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG,
        mph@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ports/8616
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Synopsis: Update of xmcd port to xmcd-2.4

State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
State-Changed-By: mph
State-Changed-When: Tue Nov 10 19:31:33 EST 1998
State-Changed-Why: 
Update applied, thanks.  I found that patch-ad did not apply, and my
understanding is that CAM support (which patch-ad supplied) is now
standard with xmcd, so I have removed patch-ad.  I have tested it on
a CAM system, but if this is wrong for some reason, let me know.


Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->mph
Responsible-Changed-By: mph
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Nov 10 19:31:33 EST 1998
Responsible-Changed-Why: 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message