From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 22 03:24:46 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C0216A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 22 Apr 2004 03:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaft.techsupport.co.uk (shaft.techsupport.co.uk
	[212.250.77.214])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D4E43D5E
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 22 Apr 2004 03:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net)
Received: from cpc2-cdif3-6-0-cust204.cdif.cable.ntl.com
	([81.103.67.204] helo=shrike.submonkey.net ident=mailnull)
	by shaft.techsupport.co.uk with esmtp (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.31; FreeBSD)
	id 1BGbNs-0009uJ-RZ; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:24:44 +0100
Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.32;
	FreeBSD)	id 1BGbNq-000Mu1-Jc; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:24:42 +0100
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:24:42 +0100
From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>
To: Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org>
Message-ID: <20040422102442.GU32710@submonkey.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>,
	Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org>,
	FreeBSD STABLE list <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
References: <Pine.BSI.4.58.0404221649040.8333@dave.horsfall.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4T94Hejb80K+e1gX"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.58.0404221649040.8333@dave.horsfall.org>
X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net>
cc: FreeBSD STABLE list <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 10:24:46 -0000


--4T94Hejb80K+e1gX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 07:58:32PM +1000, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> I decided to take the plunge and perform my very first upgrade, from 4.7
> to (I thought) 4.9, by CVSuping RELENG_4 and "make buildworld" etc.
>=20
> Well, imagine my dismay when I was greeted with 4.10-BETA instead...
>=20
> Is this release considered stable?  It isn't even mentioned on the FreeBSD
> page.  Or did I stuff up, and should have used RELENG_4_9_X instead?

At the moment, 4.10-BETA =3D=3D STABLE. Within the the week, this will
change to 4.10-RC1, then maybe 4.10-RC2 and finally 4.10-STABLE.

> Are there any, umm, release notes for 4.10-BETA, so I can see what I'm
> in for?

They're in src/release, but you do have STABLE.  The "BETA" in 4.10-BETA
means that we're considering this code for release as 4.10-RELEASE, and
that's all.

Ceri
--=20

--4T94Hejb80K+e1gX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAh51qocfcwTS3JF8RAj3jAKCnib/2ExiL3AELzNM9KF1pH5Ig1QCdGyeV
hMSZV03VrqRQBGfBsKrjz2Y=
=4b36
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--4T94Hejb80K+e1gX--