From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 07:36:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4F816A4B3 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 07:36:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ms-smtp-01.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-01.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99CB243FE0 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 07:36:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158])h8JESh0Q001479; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:28:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) h8JEZrlB072832; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:35:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Christer Solskogen In-Reply-To: <3293.148.121.98.136.1063972247.squirrel@carebears.mine.nu> References: <3293.148.121.98.136.1063972247.squirrel@carebears.mine.nu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-maOQARoo4mC7bXl3TMoJ" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1063982163.14992.2.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:36:03 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_XIMIAN autolearn=ham version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrading from gnome 2.2 to 2.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:36:14 -0000 --=-maOQARoo4mC7bXl3TMoJ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 07:50, Christer Solskogen wrote: > I`m a bit confused. > The topic on #freebsd-gnome on freenode says: > "Use portupgrade -rf -m BATCH=3Dyes ORBit2 ; portupgrade -R -m BATCH=3Dye= s > gnome2 to upgrade from GNOME 2.2 to 2.4." >=20 > freshports(and this list) says > "portupgrade -rf -m BATCH=3Dyes atk - portupgrade -R -m BATCH=3Dyes gnome= 2" >=20 > Should the portupgrade on 'atk' or 'ORBit2' be used?(or both?) The ORBit2 version is more correct. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-maOQARoo4mC7bXl3TMoJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/axRTb2iPiv4Uz4cRAp+oAJ9s8n8wvHolLis9ji7RK9tyLC9L1gCfX4kD /lctu7TDIOCSkKQ337Sbc+A= =oXe/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-maOQARoo4mC7bXl3TMoJ--