From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Aug 27 11:32:46 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA19658
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 11:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.uniserve.com (mercury.uniserve.com [204.191.197.248])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA19653
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 11:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from haven.uniserve.com (haven.uniserve.com [198.53.215.121]) by mercury.uniserve.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA13170 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 11:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 11:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: options "NO_SWAPPING" ?
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.960827113337.14594C-100000@haven.uniserve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


  Exactly what impact does "NO_SWAPPING" have on a 2.1.5+ system?

  I started using this back in 2.1-stable days to avoid some bugs causing
panics (pmap related I believe).  Is it still recommended?

Tom