From owner-freebsd-security Mon May 15 11: 1:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D7C37BBFD for ; Mon, 15 May 2000 11:01:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA03881; Mon, 15 May 2000 12:00:46 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20000515115811.045e6690@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 12:00:37 -0600 To: Paul Hart From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: (forw) Back door in Minivend Cc: mike@minivend.com, security@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <4.3.1.2.20000515094342.045eb7e0@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 10:04 AM 5/15/2000, Paul Hart wrote: >On Mon, 15 May 2000, Brett Glass wrote: > > > According to Bruce Perens, the next version of the GPL will impose > > nasty conditions upon service providers and merchants who use GPLed > > code, such as requiring them to reveal all of their in-house additions > > to it even if they do not redistribute it. > >And how much FUD spinning is that? SPIN IT BABY!! It's not FUD; it is the absolute truth. I have the tape of the session at the February LinuxWorld in which Bruce said that -- emphatically. One of these days, people will begin to get the idea that the GPL is not actually about freedom. It is, rather, a weapon of spite and an attempt to accumulate power and control. --Brett Glass If nothing else, the brain is an educational toy. -- Tom Robbins To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message