From owner-freebsd-small Fri Oct 19 21:20:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from granite.he.net (granite.he.net [216.218.226.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377D337B401 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 21:20:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from donner (ACB4D722.ipt.aol.com [172.180.215.34]) by granite.he.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with SMTP id VAA32411 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 21:20:45 -0700 Delivered-To: Message-ID: <001901c1591d$b1e541c0$76a8fea9@donner> From: "Eric Chiu" To: References: <01c901c15837$2b7de100$6401a8c0@longs.org> Subject: picoBSD vs uclinux Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 21:57:31 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG How does picoBSD compare to uclinux and other embedded OSs in terms of footprint? Thanks for your help! Eric Chiu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message