From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 8 18:49:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE9F16A4E4 for ; Sun, 8 May 2005 18:49:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-in-05.arcor-online.net (mail-in-05.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFB043DAD for ; Sun, 8 May 2005 18:49:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-05-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-05-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.17]) by mail-in-05.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B5A1DC8A; Sun, 8 May 2005 20:49:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-in-03.arcor-online.net (mail-in-05.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.45]) by mail-in-05-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E769010A28F; Sun, 8 May 2005 20:49:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (dsl-082-083-044-065.arcor-ip.net [82.83.44.65]) by mail-in-03.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED191DC8A; Sun, 8 May 2005 20:49:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kiste.my.domain (lofi@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j48InWUw011401 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 8 May 2005 20:49:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) From: Michael Nottebrock To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 20:49:30 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <427E4687.40901@uvm.edu> <200505082044.52084.lofi@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200505082044.52084.lofi@freebsd.org> X-Face: =Ym$`&q\+S2X$4`X%x%6"L4>Y,$]<":'L%c9"#7#`2tb&E&wsN31on!N\)3BD[g<=?utf-8?q?=2EjnfV=5B=0A=093=23?=>XchLK,o;>bD>c:]^;:>0>vyZ.X[,63GW`&M>}nYnr]-Fp``,[[@lJ!QL|sfW!s)=?utf-8?q?A2!*=0A=09vNkB/=7CL-?=>&QdSbQg X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: "James E. Flemer" Subject: Re: Why are implicit package dependencies recorded? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 18:49:37 -0000 --nextPart2402145.oO0TC5tDve Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday, 8. May 2005 20:44, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > Both of these cases can be avoided by building P with the same flags > > that D was built with. In the simple case, that does not seem like a > > bad solution, but in practice there can be a huge number of deps and > > sub-deps (mplayer has around 45). Ah, I've been reading too fast again. Yes, all packages in a dependency-cha= in=20 will have to be built to match. It would be possible to make the pkg_* tool= s=20 smarter in order to avoid that, but at the moment quite everything (from=20 pkg_* to the package cluster scripts) relies on prerecorded (or=20 pre-generated, i.e. INDEX) sub-deps. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart2402145.oO0TC5tDve Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCfl87Xhc68WspdLARAuGMAJ9Y7bfSpIO9Hd1RVwgaKuMIrUgegwCfbK64 qSsknxJDT/C4ru7/KO25zKI= =5Lyu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2402145.oO0TC5tDve--