From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 10 06:57:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A291106564A for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 06:57:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from claudiu.vasadi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337848FC12 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 06:57:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so2044497pbb.13 for ; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 23:57:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=KMhB7ukyoDL9qrOZTwx6OouYxjTTwclgPExHYXXemCQ=; b=iOlpx4/GJDLuaXpV5Kvc+NRLkOunO08/mgre6ymm+xp4DGc7ZPr8ieSM4hdCfcq5Xx zO2EyyU1qU3FGMMfV8ow3/N0U8CyTYfFsyzUTO3k/uv3EojE8wHf1ras0YsHC3Hiih0d eDQmqezNjpgMcOpivG1SyVjLsMmdyOmGJNpKgdDf83Uf3yRWdmFnQvJOr04WUwsc+Vh0 NsMwV9/uwOuSLsjL+Nje0yIqfrbNdAhC4No3bwVzjNAf10H6S34UNCMRL+IOcGX+HWOY h1z3eBCm6Vcyd8arsyxJ+T5MVD8WYosA3rRC359/ZEz9r7Yy+4H38a5Wxj1iU+GmrKHK lgtg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.129.168 with SMTP id nx8mr4642910pbb.112.1347260236270; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 23:57:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.191.197 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 23:57:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120909204920.51697435@papi> References: <20120905115140.GF15915@FreeBSD.org> <50476187.8000303@gibfest.dk> <20120905183607.GI15915@glebius.int.ru> <20120906064640.GL15915@glebius.int.ru> <20120909204920.51697435@papi> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 08:57:16 +0200 Message-ID: From: claudiu vasadi To: Mario Lobo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] merging projects/pf into head X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 06:57:17 -0000 On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Mario Lobo wrote: > On Sun, 9 Sep 2012 17:12:52 +0000 (UTC) > "Bjoern A. Zeeb" wrote: > > > > Everyone agrees that altq needs to vanish, we know other code > > exists/has been pondered; we'll see who might come forward. > > > > /bz > > > > Forgive my lame question. I'm just a simple user and I've been using > altq in pf for a good while and it has just been doing a good job (as > far as I can see, which may not be as far as it should be seen) on a > double wan (setfib) machine. True, I don't have a big ext network load > and the 2 links are just 1M and 2M, with 210 rules loaded, lots of rdrs, > rtables route-tos, 2 luscas,1 VBox VM server. Never had a single panic > on this machine. > > FreeBSD ALLENFW 8.2-STABLE #0: Tue Nov 29 11:35:28 BRT 2011 amd64 > > Is it possible to explain (quickly, if you must) why altq needs to > vanish? > > Thanks, > > -- > Mario Lobo > http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br > FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > http://bsdly.blogspot.de/2011/07/anticipating-post-altq-world.html for starters. -- Best regards, Claudiu Vasadi