From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 27 02:11:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DBA16A4B3 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 02:11:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ws9.cdotb.ernet.in (fw.cdotb.ernet.in [202.41.72.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507A743F85 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 02:11:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from saye@cdotb.ernet.in) Received: from localhost (saye@localhost) by ws9.cdotb.ernet.in (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9RAFm8O018655 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:15:48 +0500 (GMT+0500) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:15:48 +0500 (GMT+0500) From: "Saye Balasubramaniam.S" To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Adding a new field into mbuf pkthdr structure X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 10:11:55 -0000 Hi, We are using FreeBsd stack in our new product. I am planning to add a new field (integer)into the pkthdr struct used in mbuf. I am worried about the side-effects of this. Will there be any side-effects? Please give your valuable feedback. regards saye ------------------------------------------------------------------