From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 29 09:49:07 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B03B16A41F
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:49:07 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ltning@anduin.net)
Received: from anduin.net (anduin.net [212.12.46.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B0F43D6E
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:49:06 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ltning@anduin.net)
Received: from ranger.anduin.net ([81.0.162.52] helo=[192.168.1.112])
	by anduin.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD))
	id 1Eh26j-0006bw-5V; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:49:05 +0100
In-Reply-To: <84dead720511290144g6e2af749re5e171fe7e6112a5@mail.gmail.com>
References: <93F6B911-8C64-4F5C-81F9-80EC271ED298@anduin.net>
	<20187843-76FC-4EAB-AFF8-7493FB0C0077@anduin.net>
	<84dead720511280654j138635abgcb9cc0978e6c26b7@mail.gmail.com>
	<02757598-222D-408E-8B33-C2EE1E6E426E@anduin.net>
	<20051128211440.GB28963@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<3A601A32-94D1-49F6-AB06-ED54D50D4B6A@anduin.net>
	<20051128235911.GA31669@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20051129094531.Y23958@anduin.net>
	<20051129091533.GA41885@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<C8244498-F58F-4CCD-9BA5-7B9E19EAD517@anduin.net>
	<84dead720511290144g6e2af749re5e171fe7e6112a5@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <FEC2AAE5-1AEB-486D-8934-E17068D142F2@anduin.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eirik_=D8verby?= <ltning@anduin.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:48:33 +0100
To: Joseph Koshy <joseph.koshy@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2)
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Reduced java/tomcat performance 6-beta3 -> 6-stable ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:49:07 -0000

On Nov 29, 2005, at 10:44 , Joseph Koshy wrote:

> E=D8> Yea yea ;) Working on it..
> E=D8> Is there a way to force ACPI-safe on the slower system?
>
> # sysctl kern.timecounter.hardware=3D<one of the values from
> kern.timecounter.choice>

kern.timecounter.choice: TSC(-100) ACPI-fast(1000) i8254(0) dummy=20
(-1000000)

ACPI-safe is not among the choices. Which means I can't choose it, I =20
presume.
I'm compiling up new kernels with ACPI_DEBUG right now, once they are =20=

installed, what can I do to determine differences in DSDT tables =20
etc.? Or whatever else is different?

/Eirik

>
> --
> FreeBSD Volunteer,     http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy
>
>