From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 26 19:56:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EEC106566C for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 19:56:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f196.google.com (mail-gx0-f196.google.com [209.85.161.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7A68FC24 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 19:56:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so160734gxk.7 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:56:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.181.70 with SMTP id k46mr1522743yhm.29.1303846915037; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:41:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (twdp-174-109-142-001.nc.res.rr.com [174.109.142.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u40sm15589yhn.77.2011.04.26.12.41.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:41:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3QJvv44ssmz2CG52 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:41:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:41:51 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20110426154151.55adde4e@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4DB71875.9030304@onetel.com> References: <4DB71875.9030304@onetel.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Hardware suggestions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 19:56:47 -0000 On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:09:41 +0100 Chris Whitehouse articulated: > On 26/04/2011 18:45, Jaime Kikpole wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Chris > > Brennan wrote: > >> Just out of curiosity, why not rack-mounted boxed? > > > > Space issues. They'll have to either fit on a shelf in one of two > > rooms, depending on the outcome of some other things. > > > > Any thoughts on brand or model? > > If you google for "low power pc" you'll find some interesting > machines mostly mini-itx with atom processors. The Intel Atom is Intel's line of low-power, low-cost and low-performance x86 and x86-64 microprocessors. It sounds like the OP is interested in something more substantial. -- Jerry ✌ jerry+fbsd@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies, ignored or reported as Spam. Do not CC this poster. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________