From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 23 15:20:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE86E16A4CE for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:20:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-29.ig.com.br (smtp-29.ig.com.br [200.226.132.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 766DB43D1F for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:20:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hlen@ig.com.br) Received: (qmail 17220 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2004 23:03:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ig.com.br) (200.141.81.51) by smtp-29.ig.com.br with SMTP; 23 Jan 2004 23:03:16 -0000 Message-ID: <4011A806.9080809@ig.com.br> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 21:02:30 -0200 From: Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20040121 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: what's the priority on building 5.1 packages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 23:20:30 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > What do you mean by "policy for 5.1 package-feeding"? I mean: will 5.1 packages continue to be offered with new software? For instance, there are no gnome 2.4 packages for 5.1.. so I had to compile the whole thing. Should I consider upgrading to 5.2 for that matter? -- Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto