From owner-freebsd-net  Thu Feb  1 17:21: 1 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1626337B4EC
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 17:20:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA81418;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 20:20:36 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from wollman)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 20:20:36 -0500 (EST)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <200102020120.UAA81418@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: sendfile()
In-Reply-To: <20010201170214.V26076@fw.wintelcom.net>
References: <1217774688.20010201133139@163.net>
	<20010201023825.A71975@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20010201180010.Q70673@hand.dotat.at>
	<001d01c08cb1$9c445d80$6201a8c0@William>
	<20010202005018.Y70673@hand.dotat.at>
	<20010201170214.V26076@fw.wintelcom.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

<<On Thu, 1 Feb 2001 17:02:14 -0800, Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> said:

> Wouldn't the socket low water mark address this though as long
> as it was > size of the http header?

No.  TCP is (supposed to be) oblivious to the send low-water mark.
The only code that looks at it is the code which determines whether a
process blocked or selecting on the socket should be awakened to frob
it.

-GAWollman



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message