From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Dec 4 19:21:16 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id TAA01481 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 4 Dec 1995 19:21:16 -0800 Received: from dg-rtp.dg.com (dg-rtp.rtp.dg.com [128.222.1.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id TAA01471 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 1995 19:21:08 -0800 Received: by dg-rtp.dg.com (5.4R3.10/dg-rtp-v02) id AA29242; Mon, 4 Dec 1995 22:20:33 -0500 Received: from ponds by dg-rtp.dg.com.rtp.dg.com; Mon, 4 Dec 1995 22:20 EST Received: from lakes (lakes [192.96.3.39]) by ponds.UUCP (8.6.11/8.6.5) with ESMTP id WAA08573; Mon, 4 Dec 1995 22:09:36 -0500 Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes (8.6.12/8.6.9) id WAA03657; Mon, 4 Dec 1995 22:11:59 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Dec 1995 22:11:59 -0500 From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <199512050311.WAA03657@lakes> To: time.cdrom.com!jkh@dg-rtp.dg.com, lakes!rivers Subject: Re: Probable problem with SL/IP installations (ifconfig sl0 not run.) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text Content-Length: 710 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > > Oh... I was confusing 2.1-STABLE with 2.1-RELEASE. I suppose, > > at some time in the not too distant past, these two were the same > > (since RELEASE came from STABLE, right?) But, I take it, STABLE > > has marched on. > > No, I think you were looking in 2.2-CURRENT since the code in -STABLE > matches the release code, modulo a few fixes I made post 2.1. > > Jordan > Well - to be explicit - I simply logged into freefall.cdrom.com and looked in /usr/src/release/sysinstall. Whatever is there is what I looked at. I assumed that since uname on freefall returned 2.1-STABLE, that's what I was looking at... so much for assuming :-) - Thanks for setting me straight - - Dave R. -