From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 1 05:14:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAFB11066526; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 05:14:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D778FC23; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 05:14:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id p715E2US026935 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:14:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id p715E2V9026934; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:14:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA02277; Sun, 31 Jul 11 22:09:05 PDT Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 05:09:09 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: avg@freebsd.org Message-Id: <4e369765.T+NLcZoj2rV7wQkF%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4E345DBD.1090503@FreeBSD.org> <4E34B0BB.9050008@FreeBSD.org> <4E353A46.1050204@FreeBSD.org> <4E35A998.5060102@FreeBSD.org> <4E35ADA3.40401@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E35ADA3.40401@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UPDATING 20110730 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 05:14:05 -0000 Andriy Gapon wrote: > If for X ports all the relevant data under /var/db/pkg fits into > fs cache, then the performance may be blazing, but once you exceed > the cache size the performance might become totally different. and/or the poorly-performing system may have enough less memory than the other for paging/swapping to be a factor.