From owner-freebsd-net Thu Feb 1 18:46:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AFF037B491 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:46:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f122ju108100; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:45:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:45:56 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Garrett Wollman Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sendfile() Message-ID: <20010201184555.W26076@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <1217774688.20010201133139@163.net> <20010201023825.A71975@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010201180010.Q70673@hand.dotat.at> <001d01c08cb1$9c445d80$6201a8c0@William> <20010202005018.Y70673@hand.dotat.at> <20010201170214.V26076@fw.wintelcom.net> <200102020120.UAA81418@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200102020120.UAA81418@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 08:20:36PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Garrett Wollman [010201 17:20] wrote: > < said: > > > Wouldn't the socket low water mark address this though as long > > as it was > size of the http header? > > No. TCP is (supposed to be) oblivious to the send low-water mark. > The only code that looks at it is the code which determines whether a > process blocked or selecting on the socket should be awakened to frob > it. How wonderfully obtuse. :) -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message