From owner-freebsd-current Sun Nov 9 22:54:14 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA08284 for current-outgoing; Sun, 9 Nov 1997 22:54:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id WAA08278; Sun, 9 Nov 1997 22:54:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id GAA01195; Mon, 10 Nov 1997 06:44:13 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199711100544.GAA01195@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: LINT brooktree848.c failure To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 06:44:13 +0100 (MET) Cc: jonny@coppe.ufrj.br, phk@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199711100106.RAA01107@rah.star-gate.com> from "Amancio Hasty" at Nov 9, 97 05:05:56 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I am waiting for Luigi to wake up so he can fix is patch. Yes, that good morning :) > patch fell thru the normal verification process from the multimedia > mailing list and it will not happen again. As Joao Carlos Mendes notices, the problem is in missing braces around the block of code in case BT848_I2CWR: the code i submitted to the multimedia list was indeed correct and I did not make the commit myself ! So I don't think it's a problem with the source of the patch, but rather a typo or so in the commit phase. Cheers Luigi