From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jul 24 18:23: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from sneakerz.org (sneakerz.org [216.33.66.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6749A37B401 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 18:23:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@sneakerz.org) Received: by sneakerz.org (Postfix, from userid 1092) id C6CC45D010; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 20:22:54 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 20:22:54 -0500 From: Alfred Perlstein To: "David E. Cross" Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: exec() doesn't update access time Message-ID: <20010724202254.H72882@sneakerz.org> References: <200107250116.VAA73267@cs.rpi.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <200107250116.VAA73267@cs.rpi.edu>; from crossd@cs.rpi.edu on Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 09:16:42PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * David E. Cross [010724 20:16] wrote: > Well over NFS an exec will update atime (because NFS doesn't differentiate > between 'exec' and 'read'). > > Under Solaris8/Sparc (on a memfs mount) exec-ing an executable does indeed > update the access time. What about under solaris UFS? It makes sense to do the update, perhaps repost to -audit along with the mention about solaris behavior. -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] Ok, who wrote this damn function called '??'? And why do my programs keep crashing in it? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message