From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul 29 13:57:53 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CF11065697
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:57:53 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org)
Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.158])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39F18FC17
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:57:53 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org)
Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 2A5EA5C3B; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:57:53 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:57:53 -0400
From: Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org>
To: Scott Bennett <bennett@cs.niu.edu>
Message-ID: <20090729135753.GB52180@atarininja.org>
References: <200907291305.n6TD5KST010432@mp.cs.niu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200907291305.n6TD5KST010432@mp.cs.niu.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: this time it's vim/distfiles
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:57:54 -0000

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 08:05:20AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
>      When portmaster tries to rebuild vim-lite, it tries to verify the
> checksums of 239 (?) patches.  (I guess I should take that as a warning.)
> Unfortunately, one of them apparently doesn't check out properly.  Here's
> an excerpt of the portmaster output.
> 
> => MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.040
> => SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.040.
> => No MD5 checksum recorded for vim/7.2.041^.
> => No SHA256 checksum recorded for vim/7.2.041^.
> => No suitable checksum found for vim/7.2.041^.
> => MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.042.
> => SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.042.
>      .
>      .
>      .
> => MD5 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.239.
> => SHA256 Checksum OK for vim/7.2.239.
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /usr/ports/editors/vim-lite.
> 
> ===>>> make failed for editors/vim-lite
> ===>>> Aborting update
> 
> ===>>> Update for vim-lite-7.2.209 failed
> ===>>> Aborting update
> 
>      I looked in distfiles and found that the line in question apparently
> had an extraneous character that displays in less and vi as a percent sign.
> 
> DISTFILE:vim/7.2.040:SIZE=1836:SHA256=ad320d45c2541a767b351fdb8720c349c468acec8cf54dcfced0a6d1e58e5d8e:MD5=4c493255ae227498016f30a0002ec1cc
> DISTFILE:vim/7.2.041%:SIZE=22405:SHA256=2f48e173df3d306edd982f8a3d5a15c65ba19694ca32bdbdaa51f8bcc48a3d06:MD5=107ba5dccb1df727601aead37abf8cd3
> DISTFILE:vim/7.2.042:SIZE=4987:SHA256=d5fa884a7c5ee77b60fe512ceccaac640c0dfc00bd435211f4e4597ae3bee2cd:MD5=99baedef8a9c908774b7ed74deacf184
> 
> I tried deleting the extra character and rerunning portmaster, but that just
> yields the same results.

Don't just delete it. Change it to a ^ and you should be OK until the
maintainer updates distinfo to reflect the recent change.

-- WXS