From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 05:09:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240A9106566B; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:09:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF528FC0C; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:09:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (adsl-157-36-144.bna.bellsouth.net [70.157.36.144]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n1O583kJ000738 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:08:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) From: Robert Noland To: Anonymous In-Reply-To: <86iqn0ldcx.fsf@gmail.com> References: <200902240100.n1O10L0h095606@freefall.freebsd.org> <1235439881.1273.1.camel@widget.2hip.net> <86iqn0ldcx.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Md4uDjDy+SFp4WDx5QTk" Organization: FreeBSD Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:09:17 -0600 Message-Id: <1235452157.1273.10.camel@widget.2hip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.4 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org, edwin@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/132035: [patch] graphics/libdrm: allow slave ports use their own COMMENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:09:27 -0000 --=-Md4uDjDy+SFp4WDx5QTk Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 06:31 +0300, Anonymous wrote: > Robert Noland writes: >=20 > > On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 01:00 +0000, edwin@FreeBSD.org wrote: > >> Synopsis: [patch] graphics/libdrm: allow slave ports use their own COM= MENT > >>=20 > >> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-x11 > >> Responsible-Changed-By: edwin > >> Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 24 01:00:20 UTC 2009 > >> Responsible-Changed-Why:=20 > >> Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) > > > > Why do you want a slave port? That is just going to complicate things. >=20 > Things are already complicated enough that distfile for libdrm-2.4.5 > doesn't include >=20 > libdrm/nouveau/nouveau_dma.h > libdrm/nouveau/nouveau_private.h >=20 > As airlied explained on #dri-devel I guess it was itentional to force > users to only use version from git. >=20 > > I don't see any reason not to install the various libdrm interfaces > > right now. >=20 > As I understand nouveau interface is not stable. It may go away to a > separate branch one day. If that happens I would not need to touch > libdrm port, only convert libdrm-nouveau from slave port to a normal one > with snapshot as distfile and switch xf86-video-nouveau to statically > link with libdrm_nouveau.a. Lets wait and deal with it when that time comes... I will at least have a say in what happens there. Once we have something resembling working nouveau drm code it may become more relevant, but I don't want to go down this path right now if we don't have to. robert. > > > > robert. --=20 Robert Noland FreeBSD --=-Md4uDjDy+SFp4WDx5QTk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkmjgP0ACgkQM4TrQ4qfROM0AwCfdT4IKxFWc0YFQD0imMsuCf6T oRgAn2VDCH4TS0Lxv8uMrG7kbn170sHO =feX4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Md4uDjDy+SFp4WDx5QTk--