From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 15 06:14:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 093AC16A41C; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 06:14:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy@athame.co.uk) Received: from hex.athame.co.uk (salama58.adsl.netsonic.fi [81.17.207.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AFF043D46; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 06:14:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy@athame.co.uk) Received: from hex.int.athame.co.uk ([192.168.1.1] helo=localhost) by hex.athame.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1DtJTD-000EKh-9d; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:14:47 +0300 From: Andy Fawcett To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:14:03 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <20050714033746.46764.qmail@web52304.mail.yahoo.com> <20050714161921.GA22293@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050715.145817.68037852.chat95@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20050715.145817.68037852.chat95@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507150914.07761.andy@athame.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org, sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Subject: Re: ELF interpreter not found? OpenOffice on Rel 5.4, amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 06:14:50 -0000 On Friday 15 July 2005 08:58, NAKATA Maho wrote: > In Message-ID: <20050714161921.GA22293@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> > > Steve Kargl wrote: > > The last time I tried building ooo on freebsd-amd64, it failed. > > I'll mark as broken for amd64 soon. this is wip. I tried building a few days ago, and the problem (IIRC) was our old friend -PIC. From what I could see, the problem was in the gcc-ooo port rather than in OOo itself, but I am definitely not an expert in all this stuff. In the end, I started running the Linux 1.1.4 OOo under emulation, which is good enough for my needs at the moment. A. -- Andy Fawcett | andy@athame.co.uk | tap@kde.org "In an open world without walls and fences, | tap@lspace.org we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." -- anon | tap@fruitsalad.org