From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Jul 6 10:42:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mercury.mich.com (mercury.mich.com [64.79.64.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D642537B9F2; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 10:42:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@almanac.yi.org) Received: from argon.gryphonsoft.com (pm014-016.dialup.bignet.net [64.79.82.128]) by mercury.mich.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA27691; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:41:49 -0400 Received: by argon.gryphonsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BD02118BC; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:39:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:39:46 -0400 From: Will Andrews To: Paul Herman Cc: Sheldon Hearn , freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/19635: add -c for grand total to df(1), like du(1) does Message-ID: <20000706133946.C10303@argon.gryphonsoft.com> References: <200007061450.HAA01348@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from pherman@frenchfries.net on Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 06:09:54PM +0200 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 06:09:54PM +0200, Paul Herman wrote: > Naturally, "no reason not to put it in" is most certainly *not* a > reason to put it in. I would like to hear some to sway me one way or > the other. How about precedent: du -c. "Hey, we could have used an awk script with du(1) too!!" -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message