From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 15 05:16:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9AC4106566B; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 05:16:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C6B8FC08; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 05:16:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.4.2] ([64.134.52.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q0F5Dj0w066708 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:13:47 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:13:39 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8BCA297C-BED9-44E9-8BE0-E718780DCFEC@bsdimp.com> References: <8D025847-4BE4-4B2C-87D7-97E72CC9D325@lassitu.de> <20120104215930.GM90831@alchemy.franken.de> <47ABA638-7E08-4350-A03C-3D4A23BF2D7E@lassitu.de> <1763C3FF-1EA0-4DC0-891D-63816EBF4A04@lassitu.de> <20120106182756.GA88161@alchemy.franken.de> <95372FB3-406F-46C2-8684-4FDB672D9FCF@lassitu.de> <20120106214741.GB88161@alchemy.franken.de> <20120108130039.GG88161@alchemy.franken.de> <23477898-8D85-498C-8E30-192810BD68A8@lassitu.de> <20120111193738.GB44286@alchemy.franken.de> To: Adrian Chadd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (harmony.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.6]); Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:13:49 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Stefan Bethke , Marius Strobl Subject: Re: Extending sys/dev/mii X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 05:16:25 -0000 On Jan 14, 2012, at 9:16 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Does the miibus code actually obey newbus at the moment? Or is it also > cutting corners somehow? It actually mostly obeys newbus at the moment. Any places that may seem = to be cutting corners are actually interfacing to lower-layers that = don't participate in newbus (like if_media). dcphy is also a little = weird because it isn't really a PHY connected via a MII bus at all. = There may also be a few allowances made since it has been ported (and = reported) to and from NetBSD and BSD/os a few times. Warner