From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr 25 10:00:22 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601F316A400
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:00:22 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tarkhil@webmail.sub.ru)
Received: from mail.sub.ru (mail.sub.ru [88.212.205.2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DB5E13C468
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:00:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tarkhil@webmail.sub.ru)
Received: (qmail 74061 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2007 14:05:54 +0400
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (88.212.205.2)
	by mail.sub.ru with SMTP; 25 Apr 2007 14:05:54 +0400
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.sub.ru
Received: from unknown ([88.212.205.2])
	by localhost (mail-new.sub.ru [88.212.205.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with SMTP id wRoCMCdNXTQL; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:05:44 +0400 (MSD)
Received: from unknown (HELO ?89.222.147.9?) (tarkhil%sub.ru@89.222.147.9)
	by techno.sub.ru with SMTP; 25 Apr 2007 10:05:44 -0000
Message-ID: <462F26A8.5090500@webmail.sub.ru>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:00:08 +0400
From: Alex Povolotsky <tarkhil@webmail.sub.ru>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070104)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
References: <c7aff4ef0704201154u52bb054cs6f93067fbaa37a21@mail.gmail.com>	<20070420190857.9A34445058@ptavv.es.net>
	<20070420191105.GA38067@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070420191105.GA38067@xor.obsecurity.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Alexey Karagodov <karagodov@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:00:22 -0000

Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:08:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>   
>>> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400
>>> From: "Alexey Karagodov" <karagodov@gmail.com>
>>> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
>>>
>>> and what is this, i mean why:
>>> WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant
>>> WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance.
>>>       
>> I thought it was pretty clear. 
>>
>> ipsec is not multi-processor safe and requires the use of GIANT. If you
>> have IPSEC in your kernel the network stack will also be giant locked
>> which will cut performance.
>>     
>
> Yep, google for extensive discussion (hint: FAST_IPSEC)
>   

No visible changes in behaviour with FAST_IPSEC

Fast IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing.

mptable still shows ONE CPU

Alex.