From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 15 01:39:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078071065672 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:39:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@gritton.org) Received: from gritton.org (gritton.org [161.58.222.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA928FC19 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:39:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@gritton.org) Received: from glorfindel.gritton.org (c-76-27-80-223.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [76.27.80.223]) (authenticated bits=0) by gritton.org (8.13.6.20060614/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m6F1dNWt037652 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:39:23 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <487BFFCA.4090105@gritton.org> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:39:22 -0600 From: James Gritton User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org References: <487BE548.3050500@gritton.org> <487BEB21.6040407@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <487BEB21.6040407@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.93, clamav-milter version 0.93 on gritton.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: jail_set_vimage - Vimage under new jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:39:25 -0000 I'd like to have "jail_set versions" of a lot of what's out there - certainly what's being currently worked on. My next target is Bjoern Zeeb's multi-ip/no-ip/ipv6 extension (actually, I've got no-ip already). But I don't want to turn it all into one grand jail_set patch without buy-in, as I don't know which patches have what kind of support. Some things like vimage work well as prison services, using the provided jail layering and remaining their own separate things. But most of the jail patches are extensions to the base jail stuff itself, and would make more sense to just add to the existing jail code. Some of these changes re-appear in different forms in different patches. - Jamie Julian Elischer wrote: > One question I have is to do with Jails in general. > There are a lot of other patches floating around with > jails features. How many of those patches are going to be > incorporated?