From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 13:52:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E5916A4CE for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 13:52:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from hood.oook.cz (hood.oook.cz [212.27.205.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727F543F85 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 13:52:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hood.oook.cz (localhost.oook.cz [127.0.0.1]) by hood.oook.cz (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB7Lqp5x078909; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 22:52:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from pav@localhost) by hood.oook.cz (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hB7LqpQ9078908; Sun, 7 Dec 2003 22:52:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: hood.oook.cz: pav set sender to pav@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Pav Lucistnik To: Colin Percival In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.1.20031207171127.02d4f708@popserver.sfu.ca> References: <5.0.2.1.1.20031207171127.02d4f708@popserver.sfu.ca> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-PSNOUhAE+M1iQv7c59Md" Message-Id: <1070833971.78821.1.camel@hood.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 22:52:51 +0100 cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: port maintainers not in contrib.additional.sgml X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 21:52:54 -0000 --=-PSNOUhAE+M1iQv7c59Md Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable V ne, 07. 12. 2003 v 18:19, Colin Percival p=ED=B9e: > By my count, there are 614 ports maintainers who are either not listed= ,=20 > or listed using a different email address, in=20 > doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/contrib.additional.sgml. > Would anyone object if I sent out a form letter to these apparently=20 > unlisted contributors, asking them if they'd like to be listed? (And is=20 > someone willing to commit the resulting massive patch when I collect the=20 > replies together?) I was under impression that only authors of new ports are listed there. If someone take existing port, he's not automatically listed there. Rather than maintainer field you should pursue Whom: from port Makefiles headers. --=20 Pav Lucistnik --=-PSNOUhAE+M1iQv7c59Md Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/06EzntdYP8FOsoIRAtCqAJ4ipMjuEEJT/3TIrO9RpbhWqa5IaQCfTamz PELg84RMIbtfuNLFh4/ak10= =4ydE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-PSNOUhAE+M1iQv7c59Md--