From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 30 08:44:10 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id IAA05427 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 08:44:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA05392 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 08:44:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA12072; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 09:46:25 -0700 Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 09:46:25 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199601301646.JAA12072@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: davidg@Root.COM Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mysterious reboots In-Reply-To: <199601300824.AAA02224@Root.COM> References: <199601300824.AAA02224@Root.COM> Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk David Greenman writes: > >We have a problem with two 2.1.0-RELEASE machines. One is a P5-100 with > > If it is possible, please upgrade to 2.1-stable. -stable contains code > to detect stack overflows and panic more gracefully. It also has several > important bugfixes which may or may not help your specific problem. Is there anything stopping us from creating a patch from 2.1R to 2.1-stable as of today? It certainly would make it easier for a lot of folks to get the new code, and also improve our public relations. This leads me to this question. Is there anyway of getting the 2.1R bits from CVS? We're using the release tag for follow on code, so can we get back to the actual code used in the release? (I suppose we could specify a date, but I'm not sure what exact date the tree was burned from.) Nate