From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 26 16:17:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CBAD1065670; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 16:17:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from mailhost.m5p.com (ip-3-2-0-2.r20.asbnva02.us.ce.gin.ntt.net [IPv6:2001:418:0:5000::16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514A88FC12; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 16:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonderland.m5p.com (wonderland.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:418:3fd::19]) by mailhost.m5p.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAQGGwMJ090984; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 11:17:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Message-ID: <4ED110FA.4060406@m5p.com> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 11:16:58 -0500 From: George Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111023 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lawrence Stewart , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <4ECEF6FD.5050006@freebsd.org> <4ED077BF.10205@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4ED077BF.10205@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mailhost.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:418:3fd::f7]); Sat, 26 Nov 2011 11:17:04 -0500 (EST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on IPv6:2001:418:3fd::f7 Cc: Subject: Re: TCP Reassembly Issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 16:17:05 -0000 On 11/26/11 00:23, Lawrence Stewart wrote: > [...] > Could those who have reported the bug and are able to recompile their > kernel to test a patch please try the following and report back to the > list: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~lstewart/patches/misctcp/tcp_reass_plugzoneleak_10.x.r227986.patch > [...] Works for me! I'm now getting a sustained throughput of 7.4MB/s, compared to 4.3MB/s on 8.2-STABLE and 3.2MB/s on 7.4-RELEASE, all on the same hardware (HP notebook with re 100Mb/s interface, reading from an 8.2-STABLE server with an alc 1000Mb/s interface, via two gigabit switches). But I'm still bemused that there should have been any TCP reassembly going on. Doesn't that imply that there was packet fragmentation? My network is uniformly 1500 byte MTU. -- George