From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 20 23:02:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C931065698 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:02:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43F18FC1F for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:02:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.mypc.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE2114DA30E for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:43:32 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at server.mypc.hu Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Y-BWKjW36oJQ for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:43:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (catv-89-132-179-104.catv.broadband.hu [89.132.179.104]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F84414DA2FD for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:43:23 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B578709.7010508@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:43:21 +0100 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; es-ES; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: how to deal with unzip on -CURRENT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:02:28 -0000 Hi all, I've got a PR (ports/142091), which made me think about the base version of unzip that was recently enabled in HEAD. I think that the current version of that port is correct and just UNZIP_CMD should be set to the base version on -CURRENT in bsd.port.mk. Or do I have to enforce ports unzip as a dependency by full path? Were there similar issues? Is there a conventional/preferred solution for this? Thanks, -- Gabor Kovesdan FreeBSD Volunteer EMAIL: gabor@FreeBSD.org .:|:. gabor@kovesdan.org WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org