From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Dec 16 02:55:55 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id CAA16295 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 16 Dec 1997 02:55:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id CAA16275 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 1997 02:55:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id JAA04814; Tue, 16 Dec 1997 09:42:24 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199712160842.JAA04814@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: Why FIONREAD has no dual for write ? To: ada@bsd.org Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 09:42:24 +0100 (MET) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199712160608.RAA03776@noether.blah.org> from "Ada" at Dec 16, 97 05:07:59 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > situations. w dou > > How about a counterpart to select() which can request a minimum number > of bytes {free,ready} in the buffer? This could also be useful in > situations where one does not wish to implement buffering; instead the > kernel buffers could be used. > > Is this feasable in light of how select() works? > > Ada. > How do you pass the (array of=) desired lengths to the new select ? Luigi