From owner-cvs-all Sun Jul 22 20: 5:56 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from assaris.sics.se (dhcp114.iss.kth.se [130.237.7.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D532437B403; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 20:05:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from assar@assaris.sics.se) Received: (from assar@localhost) by assaris.sics.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) id FAA33567; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 05:06:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from assar) To: Wes Peters Cc: Brian Somers , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libutil ecalloc.c emalloc.3 emalloc.c erealloc.c estrdup.c Makefile libutil.h References: <3698025593.995835470@blabber> From: Assar Westerlund Date: 23 Jul 2001 05:06:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: Wes Peters's message of "Sun, 22 Jul 2001 20:57:50 -0600" Message-ID: <5lwv508huv.fsf@assaris.sics.se> Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070098 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.98) Emacs/20.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Wes Peters writes: > I'd rather see such a library in a port/package. Sure, the emalloc > etc., might help clarify applications, but like Brian I'm not convinced > they need to be in our standard library. But this function (emalloc) is used and included in lots of the programs in the tree. Since you're not likely suggesting we make them dependent of a port/package, should we keep copies of this function everywhere or should we just inline it? /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message