From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 01:32:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07BAA16A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 01:32:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00C1D43D53 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 01:32:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emanuel.strobl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Mar 2005 01:31:58 -0000 Received: from flb.schmalzbauer.de (EHLO cale.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de) (62.245.232.135) by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 04 Mar 2005 02:31:58 +0100 X-Authenticated: #301138 From: Emanuel Strobl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 02:31:49 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: In-Reply-To: X-Birthday: 10/06/72 X-CelPhone: +49 173 9967781 X-Tel: +49 89 18947781 X-Country: Germany X-Address: Munich, 80686 X-OS: FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1756916.eMXhEy3lxE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200503040231.54121@harrymail> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: Daniel Eriksson Subject: Re: Sharing directories with jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 01:32:01 -0000 --nextPart1756916.eMXhEy3lxE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Freitag, 4. M=E4rz 2005 01:50 schrieb Daniel Eriksson: > Emanuel Strobl wrote: > > You can also use nullfs (man (8) mount_nullfs). It's slow and > > not certified to be bugfree but I never had any problems and > > especially for centralized ports very useful. > > What has given you the idea that nullfs is slow? I'm using it extensively > and have not noticed any significant slowdown. Under what usecase(s) is it > slow? (My usage is mainly for medium to large files, with <200 files per > directory.) Some perfomance benchmarks at 5.3 release cycle showed that the way nullfs= =20 works is suboptimal, also file backed memory devices are very slow, but I'm= =20 no developer so I can't explain you exactly why. Perhaps someone had a look= =20 at this in the meantime, I didn't do any tests since then but I also saw no= =20 commit log which indicates that people were working on that. =2DHarry > > /Daniel Eriksson > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --nextPart1756916.eMXhEy3lxE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCJ7qKBylq0S4AzzwRAk2vAJ9O0itW/gsb2ZYj4MPZaVDlujyk3wCfbKIm yZtA2cG/zDj3f4LZieSxQMg= =coBp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1756916.eMXhEy3lxE--