From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 17 10:03:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92BF397 for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:03:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emz@norma.perm.ru) Received: from elf.hq.norma.perm.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:14c0::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE71A01 for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:03:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.248.32] ([192.168.248.32]) by elf.hq.norma.perm.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2HA34xf042068 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 16:03:06 +0600 (YEKT) (envelope-from emz@norma.perm.ru) Message-ID: <514594D7.1020202@norma.perm.ru> Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 16:03:03 +0600 From: "Eugene M. Zheganin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: carp regression in 9.1 ? References: <3B04FCB1-D0D4-4BC9-BB15-5221F438738C@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <3B04FCB1-D0D4-4BC9-BB15-5221F438738C@my.gd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (elf.hq.norma.perm.ru [192.168.3.10]); Sun, 17 Mar 2013 16:03:06 +0600 (YEKT) X-Spam-Status: No hits=-101.0 bayes=0.5 testhits ALL_TRUSTED=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on elf.hq.norma.perm.ru X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 10:03:09 -0000 Hi. On 14.03.2013 20:47, Fleuriot Damien wrote: > I'm experiencing this odd behavior with 9.1 r24791 for amd64. > You should definitely sit on 8.x until 10.x will become stable, or upgrade to 10.x from 9.x (at least this is what I do). Carp is entirely rewritten in 10.x branch. In the same time, in 9.x carp seems to be desperately broken: for example I was experiencing weird panics on boot, weird behaviour, and, when enabling WITNESS, lots of carp-related LORs. Furthermore, I was completely unable to boot up with a ipv6-enabled carp - I had to initialize it in multiuser with a custom script. All of this doesn't happen on 10.x, which I had to upgrade to. Right now, if we're talking about carp, my 10.x production works like a charm. 9.x branch just isn't destined to production. The situation is a bit improved on 9.1, but still I can compare this release to 4.6 or 5.0. Eugene.