From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 5 09:58:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998281065674; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:58:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from ixe-mta-27.emailfiltering.com (ixe-mta-27-tx.emailfiltering.com [194.116.199.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930108FC13; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:58:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gw5.york.ac.uk ([144.32.129.29]) by ixe-mta-27.emailfiltering.com with emfmta (version 4.8.3.54) by TLS id 1265773438 for eadler@FreeBSD.org; 35888541e706b19d; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:48:12 +0100 Received: from ury.york.ac.uk ([144.32.108.81]:41862) by mail-gw5.york.ac.uk with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R0Vmm-0002ag-18; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:48:12 +0100 Received: from gavin (helo=localhost) by ury.york.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R0Vml-00035m-QL; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 10:48:11 +0100 Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:48:11 +0100 (BST) From: Gavin Atkinson X-X-Sender: gavin@ury.york.ac.uk To: Eitan Adler In-Reply-To: <201109041931.p84JVk3B000156@repoman.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <201109041931.p84JVk3B000156@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/massh Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:58:35 -0000 On Sun, 4 Sep 2011, Eitan Adler wrote: > eadler 2011-09-04 19:31:46 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Added files: > security/massh Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist > Log: > Massh makes it possible to perform the following on hundreds, or even > thousands of hosts in a parallelized fashion: > > * Run Remote Commands > * Push and Execute Pre-Written Scripts > * Push Files > * Pull Files Would this port not be better in sysutils? It doesn't seem to have anything directly to do with security. Thanks, Gavin