From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul 29 10:09:04 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3E3D2
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:09:04 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net)
Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0F152B2B
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:09:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 946366A6000;
 Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:09:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r6TA92C9018092;
 Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:09:02 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net)
Received: (from lars@localhost)
 by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r6TA92UL016931;
 Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:09:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars)
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:09:02 +0200
From: Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net>
To: Kimmo Paasiala <kpaasial@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bind9 and CVE-2013-4854
Message-ID: <20130729100902.GM59101@e-new.0x20.net>
References: <20130726230549.GB64252@lonrach.local>
 <CAMCLrkF8u-UmMnfG9=RkGMWYZn+L4vK7Mg1XW_pa9HbdLx4r8w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130727085458.GB68862@lonrach.local>
 <46029EF7-D574-4953-AE8D-4BA79F5295BB@plosh.net>
 <20130727210809.GA70513@lonrach.local>
 <CA+7WWSejypEnci4vrDm=sNDP5RZyojsHHFb+JYsHxLjKQR4CyA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oJoa/b7Rsqp4yzB0"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+7WWSejypEnci4vrDm=sNDP5RZyojsHHFb+JYsHxLjKQR4CyA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3
X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:37:35 +0000
Cc: freebsd-security <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
 <freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:09:04 -0000


--oJoa/b7Rsqp4yzB0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 12:03:43PM +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> A question related to this:
>=20
> What is it that prevents BIND from being removed from the base when
> there are very well working ports of BIND already that are far easier
> to update when vulnerabilities are found. Is it the dig(1), host(1)
> and nslookup(1) utilities?

Yes.

--oJoa/b7Rsqp4yzB0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlH2Pz4ACgkQKc512sD3afgNUgCgmGUvFJuJbYdWiG1On3KIoZDS
tEEAn1Kqi1aOWxwvQBLZ2OOhhVHnjqZd
=D/1Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--oJoa/b7Rsqp4yzB0--